Connecting the Dots ~ Fred Allebach

Fred Allebach Fred Allebach is a member of the City of Sonoma’s Community Services and Environmental Commission, and an Advisory Committee member of the Sonoma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency. Fred is a member of Sonoma Overlook Trail Stewards, as well as Sonoma Valley Housing Group and Transition Sonoma Valley.

Archives



Report from Alliance for a Just Recovery meeting

Posted on November 26, 2018 by Fred Allebach

Can you find the justifications for higher minimum wages, affordable housing, and comprehensive high density infill planning hidden in the text below?

Jesus Guzman, Graton Labor Center

Jesus’ points all grounded in producible data, Census data. The county has a growing and diverse population with growing and persistent inequality. 1/3 people of color (growing), 2/3 white (not growing as fast). Whites have the bulk of resources and power. Unemployment level is good, yet one out of five live in a working poverty family. Labor market not doing enough to lift people out of poverty. 40% of working poverty families are LatinX. From 2005 – 2016, no changes in LatinX earnings. Wages have stagnated and dropped for the bottom 60%. Median income overall stayed flat. The 80-100th percentiles are where wages have increased. Women of color are the lowest earners of all. More than three in five low wage workers, largely people of color, are over the age of 30. People of color are 1/3 of population but over 1/2 of low wage workers.

The middle class, the now “missing middle” has been replaced with low wage jobs. Nurses and managers make in the $40 an hour range, the rest of meeting-slide-show-listed job categories make $10 – $12 an hour. 3/4 of all jobs by 2020 will be under $20 an hour.

Rent is too high, wages not keeping up; the gap between the two needs to be closed. Rent burden. Challenge: how to grow an inclusive economy that benefits all? We know the problem, what are the solutions?

Steve Birdlebough, Sierra Club

$5000 a year in transportation costs can be saved by reducing drive distance to work. Downtown housing fills city coffers, high density infill pays civic expenses. Barriers to infill: high core area impact fees; less fees in rural areas draw people out of cores . Need to readjust incentives, defer fees, pay fees in installments. Barrier: off-street parking requirements; unbundle parking fees from construction costs. Give rental/ owner option of not having a car, i.e. no built-in car parking costs.

Free parking is not the best way to manage. Need better bus service, better bike systems, scooters.

Petaluma plan area strategy (see “smart code” p, 125) to handle CEQA roadblocks: building shapes are already decided, the use is not, the environmental work is done ahead of time; this makes it cheaper and easier to develop.

Tom Conlon, Transition Sonoma Valley

Climate denial California style. Sonoma County has its own kind of climate denial. Home insurance: elites are pulling away, wealthy can pay for premium insurance and 3rd party wildfire defense; states need to look at where buildings can be built.

The people bail out corporations (PG&E) when risk gets too high. State bills (Bill Dodd) codify that people pay for PG&E risk. 50,000 county homes at risk for wildfire.

Use GIS mapping to adapt to fire risk. High density infill is a fire precaution. “If we act individually, it will be too little too late, of we act as a community, maybe just enough just in time.”

Teri Shore, Greenbelt Alliance

High core-housing density equals lower fire danger. Medium density urban/ rural residential sprawl is the highest built-landscape fire danger. Land use and where we build is critical to minimizing fire danger; stay out of urban/ wildland interface areas. Stay within UGBs and focus growth there. Work at level of General Plans to incentivize location of built landscape.

Beatrice Camacho, North Bay Organizing Project (NBOP)

Inequality is a world-wide problem. Real estate industry spent $70 million to defeat Prop 10 rent control; large corporations are against tenant protections. Need for Santa Rosa and other cities and county to extend the 10% emergency rent cap, to prevent rent price gouging. There is still displacement at high rates. NBOP working on county-wide tenant’s union, create a renter’s movement.

Shelly Browning, Friends of Public Banking

Interest paid on bonds is a huge public cost, and banks get that money. Global warming is caused by fossil fuels, who is financing the fossil fuel industry? Banks, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America etc.

Santa Rosa revenue is 38% from sales tax, now banked with Chase, as well as are Santa Rosa pensions. The city can get out of the deal with six-month notice. Where does your city bank and invest? Are you financing global warming? “All roads lead to Wall Street.”

Credit unions and public banking are the road to Main Street. With public banking, we own the bank, we finance our own values with our bank. Refuse to invest in fossil fuels and private prisons. Bank of North Dakota is the model. In California, need to be a charter city and have home rule power, need those to have a public bank for a specific city.

Marty Bennett, North Bay Jobs with Justice

Expedited $15 an hour minimum wage campaign. See UC Berkeley Law Center for estimate of impact of $15 on North Bay. Anaheim has $18-$22 over five years, this is the model. San Mateo County is on a fast track.

$15 minimum is $3000 more a year, and that will help a lot. 30% earn less than $14 an hour. US currently has levels of inequality like the 1930s Great Depression. $23 an hour is a conservative measure of a real living, minimum wage in Sonoma County.

Before the Tubb’s Fire, county rents were up 25% from 2010, and now post fire, they are up 36% on top of that. Wages are only up 9%. There is a massive displacement crisis in all of coastal California. We need a shorter track to $15.

$15 will hurt small business? Wal-Mart etc. employs 2/3 of minimum wage workers, and Wal-Mart et al are enjoying record profits. It’s criminal to have people working full time on a part-time income.

Linda Evans, NBOP

Inclusion and equity needs to be advocated and enacted by government. Government sets the rules of the game. Language inclusion is important, no translation of Sheriff fire press conferences until day five of the fires. Non-citizens are now doubly discriminated against, to accept any aid is grounds for denying citizenship. Just plain cruel federal policies

Fred’s comments on meeting content

Problem: people build and live in high risk areas; disaster capitalism is ready to profit from cycles of maladaptive rebuilding. Incentives are all wrong, systemic costs and benefits are way out of kilter. The entrenched power and inertia of business as usual (BAU) is the core problem, not only for fire rebuild, but how we live and work in our economy in general.

One issue, and why many find developers, “business”, and landlords to be bad actors: the whole system is lined up to rip people off, given the slightest chance, low wages, high rents, high costs, and poorly located/ high cost building prevail. Given the option and freedom, we end up with rip-off scenarios, and trusting the same actors to somehow create a more just society is plain not going to work. Where is the sense of creating a just society from the big money interests? We need a fundamental rearrangement of incentives to change anything, but that is huge, diffuse and daunting.

Underlying issue: the “bad actors” and “same actors” are really just us; we all do the same given the chance. If at bottom we are all out for ourselves, and will mostly only act in our own interests, to not inconvenience ourselves, what do we do to get survivable at the scale we’re at now? How to change the channel of ourselves?

One easy call: go to public banking; cities divest from banks that invest in fossil fuel industry. Everyone divest, ASAP, call your broker now, get rid of the dirty energy funds and move them to clean energy investment. Do it.

Sonoma could bank with a Santa Rosa public bank or other state public bank? Why not? Can we shoot for it?

Another easy call: Sonoma city council extend 10% emergency rent cap, at the Dec 3rd city council meeting. Go HHH!

We need our public agents to be bold decision makers, with political will to change system. Policy makers and decision makers should get on board and be early adopters of the points made above. There is year’s lag time before policy catches up with the truths made by grass roots groups. Cut out the middle time, adopt now, radically change the rules that govern systemic incentives. Make it attractive to do the right things.

It starts with the money and how money is managed. Get to the head of the snake. Adopt public banking so money serves Main Street and not Wall Street. Don’t make it easy for people to bail out BAU corporations; make PG&E a publicly owned utility, take the profit out of service and inclusion.

Inclusion and equity starts with the money: pay your help, especially women of color, a living wage of at least $23 an hour.

For insurance, the issue is getting all into the same pool, with same incentives, but that will never work as long as a small percent have most of the wealth; the inequity is the main problem, allows super wealthy to make poor choices that end up being costs for the rest to bear. We need a few top wealthy to be like City of Angels and became human, put assets quickly into public service projects, tip other wealthy to do the same.

$15 an hour presentation will be made by Marty Bennet to Sonoma city council in January. HHH council can be bold and vote for $18 off the bat, with minimum wage tied to annual cost of living adjustments after that. Time to favor Main Street and the little guys.



One thought on “Report from Alliance for a Just Recovery meeting

  1. There is affordable housing but it just is just not in Sonoma. That is why people live an hour or more away from where they work. Also – many people enjoy their time alone in the car. They enjoy that space. It might be the only time they get to themselves all day long. So it is very complex issue. People are in their bubble listening to their radio or music or book on tape. I know many people that enjoy this a great deal. Affordable housing – truly affordable housing in the town of Sonoma just ain’t going to happen. It might happen in a relative sense but it won’t be affordable …. good luck however as it appears you have a passion for solving this unsolvable problem…

Comments are closed.


Sonoma Sun | Sonoma, CA