In a four to one vote Tuesday night, the school board decided to move forward with the “Race to the Top” application process. Gary DeSmet was the only hold out stating, “I voted no because of the addendum. I didn’t feel that this was something to addend.”
California, like many other states, is currently in the process of applying for federal Race to the Top (RTTT) competitive grant funds. California’s share of the approximately $4.5 billion in federal monies is estimated to be $350 – $700 million.
The District now joins the State proposal, which is due to the federal government by January 19.
As a RTTP partner, the District agrees to implementing each of four key reform areas:
Support the transition to enhanced standards and high-quality assessments.
Use data to improve instruction, including use of an enhanced local instructional improvement system and professional development related to use of data.
Improvement of teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance, including conducting annual evaluations using multiple measures. Evaluations may be formative in nature in one year and summative in the next year.
Turning around any designated lowest-achieving schools.
During public comment, the program received widely opposing reviews from teachers and constituents. Valley of the Moon Teachers Association President Janet Hansen said that while the union is all for thoughtful reform, she feared the ramifications of a program developed with such speed. “We’re not comfortable not knowing all the aspects of this program. How much change do we want to institute for maybe as little as $100 a student? VTMA teachers are cautious and suspicious.”
Others felt that turning down any offer of money for Valley students was a mistake. “We might end up with displeased teachers but the students need to take a priority. The students need as much money as they can get,” said student Trustee Sean Hammett.
Justin Frese, assistant superintendent of business for the district reiterated what many in the audience felt. “We still need answers to two main questions: how much money and what’s expected. If the amount of money is small and the requirements unreasonable, then forget it. But if this is in line with our strategic plan, then I’d recommend we go ahead with the application as long as we can back out if necessary when the time comes,” said Frese.
If the state receives approval, the district will have 90 days to develop a final Scope of Work and submit a plan and accompanying budget. If a district decides it is unable to participate after submitting the MOU, it will be allowed to exit the agreement with the State.
