Editor: I wonder why in all the analysis of the constitutionality of mandatory health insurance, why no one mentions mandatory automobile insurance? Why is there no repeal effort for that if mandatory insurance is such an onerous governmental burden? The arguments for both are exactly the same, innocent people pay more and get screwed financially because others carry no insurance. So you make everyone carry, make a common pool of all citizens and that is to everyone’s benefit. We’re already used to mandatory insurance so what is the big deal? It makes sense. The deal, of course, is for Republicans to sabotage Obama at every opportunity so they can implement their program of unregulated markets/ regulated bedrooms, starting WW3 and having the rich get richer while the middle class disappears.

Be First to Comment